Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University
Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University operates in Other, based in MENLO PARK.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University has raised $4.5M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Largest single filing: $4.5M on 2009-08-01.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2009-08-01.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University at approximately $67M (range $6.1M–$366M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.69× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2007–2009 (168 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (69% of peer median) for its niche.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Last raise 16.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 64% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 77% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Osiris Holdings, LLC, C3 Acquisition Co. LLC, NARS Holding Company, Inc., LBC Western, Inc., Grid Net Inc.
Peoplefiled
10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.