Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

BluEarth Carbon Development, Inc.

BluEarth Carbon Development, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

BluEarth Carbon Development, Inc. operates in Other, based in LAS VEGAS.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

BluEarth Carbon Development, Inc. has raised $480K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $480K on 2023-03-20.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-03-20.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models BluEarth Carbon Development, Inc. at approximately $3.4M (range $320K–$17M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.67× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2022–2024 (1723 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 3.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 22% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 19% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: El American Inc., AEA Hope, LLC, Joy Milk Tea Inc., Manage Mindfully, Inc., ValiDateMe LLC.

Peoplefiled

4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.