Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Blatant Entertainment, Inc.

Blatant Entertainment, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Blatant Entertainment, Inc. operates in Other, based in CARPINTERIA.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Blatant Entertainment, Inc. has raised $481K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $481K on 2006-08-15.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2006-08-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Blatant Entertainment, Inc. at approximately $11M (range $320K–$126M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.96× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2004–2006 (7 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (96% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 19.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 22% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 40% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Days of Wonder, Inc., Bright Ideas Entertainment, LLC, Kwk Opportunity Fund Lp, Rainbow Reward Holdings Ltd, Tech Gold Plus, LLC.

Peoplefiled

7 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.