Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Bion Environmental Technologies Inc

Bion Environmental Technologies Inc looks under-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Bion Environmental Technologies Inc operates in Environmental Services, based in OLD BETHPAGE.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Bion Environmental Technologies Inc has raised $54M in disclosed capital across 36 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $14M on 2015-07-01.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2024-05-31.

Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Bion Environmental Technologies Inc at approximately $505K (range $125K–$1.1M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.02× the median modeled value of Series A Environmental Services companies in 2022–2024 (8 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 4 months.

Last raise 2.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round was 3.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 93% of Environmental Services peers (242 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 2% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Phospholutions, Inc., Omni Recycling Holdings, LLC, NativState LLC, 3Degrees Group, Inc., Zhang Heng Technology Ltd.

Peoplefiled

24 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.

Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.