Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Better ATM Services, Inc.
Better ATM Services, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Better ATM Services, Inc. operates in Other, based in MESA.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Better ATM Services, Inc. has raised $13M in disclosed capital across 19 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).
Largest single filing: $1.6M on 2012-07-13.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-12-31.
Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Better ATM Services, Inc. at approximately $2.9M (range $142K–$23M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.09× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 3 months.
Last raise 11.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round was 6.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 80% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 17% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.
Peoplefiled
15 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.
Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.