Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Bay Cities, LLC

Bay Cities, LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Bay Cities, LLC operates in Other, based in REDWOOD CITY.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Bay Cities, LLC has raised $300K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $150K on 2021-09-07.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-03-01.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Bay Cities, LLC at approximately $1.7M (range $100K–$11M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.83× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2022–2024 (1723 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (83% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 6 months.

Last raise 4.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 15% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 10% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: El American Inc., AEA Hope, LLC, Joy Milk Tea Inc., Manage Mindfully, Inc., ValiDateMe LLC.

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.