Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Australis Capital Inc

Australis Capital Inc looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Australis Capital Inc operates in Other, based in LAS VEGAS.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Australis Capital Inc has raised $3.2M in disclosed capital across 4 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.6M on 2018-10-25.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-02-09.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Australis Capital Inc at approximately $3.5M (range $304K–$18M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.31× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2022–2024 (1231 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 14 months.

Last raise 4.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 2.4× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 58% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 19% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Dropee Inc., NFH Northern Project Development, LLC, FactorFund-Note-2022 LLC, Immersion Elements LLC, Possip, Inc..

Peoplefiled

18 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.