Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Astranis Space Technologies Corp.

Astranis Space Technologies Corp. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Astranis Space Technologies Corp. operates in Software / Tech, based in SAN FRANCISCO.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Astranis Space Technologies Corp. has raised $376M in disclosed capital across 6 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series D+ (a $100M–$400M round).

Largest single filing: $281M on 2021-03-19.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-03-19.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Astranis Space Technologies Corp. at approximately $7.4B (range $1.6B–$15.0B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.25× the median modeled value of Series D+ Software / Tech companies in 2019–2021 (34 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 9 months.

Last raise 5.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 9.1× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 99% of Software / Tech peers (3920 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 100% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Mango Technologies, Inc., Cloud Guru Group Inc., Alternative Platform LLC, Badger Technology Co Holdings Ltd, Economic Transformation Technologies Corp.

Peoplefiled

6 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.