Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Aspargo Laboratories, Inc.

Aspargo Laboratories, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Aspargo Laboratories, Inc. operates in Pharmaceuticals, based in ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Aspargo Laboratories, Inc. has raised $9.7M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $7.9M on 2020-02-02.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-11-28.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Aspargo Laboratories, Inc. at approximately $3.1M (range $332K–$9.5M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.09× the median modeled value of Series A Pharmaceuticals companies in 2022–2024 (64 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports $0–$1M revenue while modeled below niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 8 months.

Last raise 3.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round was 5.3× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 53% of Pharmaceuticals peers (1613 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 5% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Hallux, Inc., Enalare Therapeutics Inc., Silver Creek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., NQ PE Project Stingray Parent, L.P., Acta Pharmaceuticals, Inc..

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.