Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Arizona Potash Holdings Ltd.

Arizona Potash Holdings Ltd. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Arizona Potash Holdings Ltd. operates in Other, based in Apache Junction.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Arizona Potash Holdings Ltd. has raised $396K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $396K on 2016-01-11.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-01-11.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Arizona Potash Holdings Ltd. at approximately $9.2M (range $264K–$104M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.13× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2016–2018 (1548 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (113% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 10.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 19% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 36% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Castleray Mezzanine Partners I, LLC, AFI Holdings, LLC, WWGL Inc., Ride Velo, Inc., ChampAmerica Inc..

Peoplefiled

4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.