Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Ardica Technologies, Inc.

Ardica Technologies, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Ardica Technologies, Inc. operates in Other Energy, based in SAN FRANCISCO.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Ardica Technologies, Inc. has raised $15M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $13M on 2015-09-04.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-09-04.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Ardica Technologies, Inc. at approximately $134M (range $16M–$729M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.26× the median modeled value of Series A Other Energy companies in 2013–2015 (81 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 15 months.

Last raise 10.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 1.9× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 75% of Other Energy peers (2049 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 86% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: AgriGroupe Energy Holdings, Brookfield Renewable Energy Partners L.P., Ofs Pro Ci, Lp, Apex Wind Energy Holdings, LLC, Ethical Electric Holdings, Inc..

Peoplefiled

14 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.