Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

APOS - Medical & Sports Technologies Ltd.

APOS - Medical & Sports Technologies Ltd. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

APOS - Medical & Sports Technologies Ltd. operates in Other Technology, based in HERZLIYA.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

APOS - Medical & Sports Technologies Ltd. has raised $23M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $15M on 2014-11-24.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-06-16.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models APOS - Medical & Sports Technologies Ltd. at approximately $76M (range $6.1M–$293M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.13× the median modeled value of Series B Other Technology companies in 2016–2018 (314 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 9 months.

Last raise 10.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 2.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 85% of Other Technology peers (21302 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 66% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Certified Inc., Universal Recognition Token, Inc., Pymetrics, Inc., Anomali Inc, Docutech Transfer, LLC.

Peoplefiled

19 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.