Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Apollo Agriculture, Inc.

Apollo Agriculture, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Apollo Agriculture, Inc. operates in Agtech / Foodtech, based in OAKLAND. Kenyan startup Apollo Agriculture has secured US$500,000 in funding to fund harvesting cycles, further develop its credit model, and expand geographically.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Apollo Agriculture, Inc. has raised $52M in disclosed capital across 6 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $33M on 2022-02-09.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-11-02.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Apollo Agriculture, Inc. at approximately $40M (range $16M–$82M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.33× the median modeled value of Series B Agtech / Foodtech companies in 2022–2024 (13 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 14 months.

Last raise 2.7 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 14 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round was 1.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 95% of Agtech / Foodtech peers (481 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 79% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Good Day Farm Louisiana, LLC, Eclipse Foods Co, MUSH Foods Inc., Partake Foods, Inc., Bond Pet Foods, Inc..

Peoplefiled

7 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.