Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Alexco Resource Corp

Alexco Resource Corp looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Alexco Resource Corp operates in Other, based in VANCOUVER.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Alexco Resource Corp has raised $3.5M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $2.8M on 2016-05-17.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-05-17.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Alexco Resource Corp at approximately $52M (range $2.5M–$408M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.51× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2016–2018 (1003 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 5 months.

Last raise 10.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 4.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 60% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 72% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Zooba Eats, Inc., EQX Capital, Inc., Alliance Time Holdings, LLC, Springfield Hockey, LLC, Spring Hill Development Partners, LLC.

Peoplefiled

10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.