Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Akili Interactive Labs, Inc.

Akili Interactive Labs, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Akili Interactive Labs, Inc. operates in Software / Tech, based in BOSTON.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Akili Interactive Labs, Inc. has raised $165M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series D+ (a $100M–$400M round).

Largest single filing: $110M on 2021-05-25.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-05-25.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Akili Interactive Labs, Inc. at approximately $2.8B (range $611M–$5.5B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.84× the median modeled value of Series D+ Software / Tech companies in 2019–2021 (34 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (84% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 37 months.

Last raise 5.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 2.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 97% of Software / Tech peers (3920 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 99% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Mango Technologies, Inc., Cloud Guru Group Inc., Alternative Platform LLC, Astranis Space Technologies Corp., Badger Technology Co Holdings Ltd.

Peoplefiled

10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.