Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

AIM-CollectorDash-2012 LLC

AIM-CollectorDash-2012 LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

AIM-CollectorDash-2012 LLC operates in Other, based in AUBURN.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

AIM-CollectorDash-2012 LLC has raised $398K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $398K on 2012-07-25.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2012-07-25.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models AIM-CollectorDash-2012 LLC at approximately $9.2M (range $265K–$104M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.22× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2010–2012 (1459 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (122% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 13.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 19% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 36% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Crown Rock Lenders, LLC, Lucas Venture Group V, LLC, Attitude Drinks Inc., Direct 2 Manufacturer, LLC, Suter Joshua Scott.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.