Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Active Mind Technology, Inc.
Active Mind Technology, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Active Mind Technology, Inc. operates in Other, based in SAN FRANCISCO.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Active Mind Technology, Inc. has raised $16M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Largest single filing: $8.5M on 2014-06-13.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-06-13.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Active Mind Technology, Inc. at approximately $128M (range $12M–$697M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.45× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2013–2015 (623 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (145% of peer median) for its niche.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 16 months.
Last raise 12.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round stepped up 1.1× from the prior — scaling.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 83% of Other peers (25008 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 85% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: CanWel Building Materials Group Ltd., New Gold Recovery USA, Inc., ZAG America, LLC, County Waste of Virginia, LLC, Sound Seal Holdings, Inc..
Peoplefiled
7 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.